KONA BLUE file: a biologics program approved, buried, never built

Two words carry most of the weight in the KONA BLUE file: “non-human biologics.” Everything else in the release is paperwork built around that phrase, and the paperwork turns out to be thinner than the phrase suggests.

The Release

The Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security released the KONA BLUE documents jointly on April 16, 2024, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) research outlet The Black Vault. The file runs 57 pages and 8.67MB. DHS declassified its material using a strike-out method, a practice that keeps old classification markings visible under a line rather than erasing them, so a reader can see what level a passage used to carry. Only one redaction in the release belongs to DHS: a passage on page 38 withheld as attorney-client material, a legal exemption covering communications between an agency and its lawyers. Every other redaction in the file was made by DoD. The paper trail also includes a February 5, 2024 letter from DHS to Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, referencing an earlier DoD request dated September 28, 2023, in which DHS agrees to supply documents and information connected to KONA BLUE. A separate letter in the file, signed by Kristie Canegallo in her role as DHS acting deputy secretary, describes KONA BLUE in plain terms as a prospective special access program. The Black Vault has additional FOIA requests tied to KONA BLUE pending since January 2024 that had not produced results at the time of this release.

What DHS Proposed

AARO’s historical review traces the proposal to the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Application Program and Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AAWSAP/AATIP), which the Defense Intelligence Agency ran from 2009 to 2012, funded through congressional earmarks, with Bigelow Aerospace of Nevada as primary contractor. DIA closed that program, concluding Bigelow’s deliverables lacked merit and utility for its mission. People who had worked on AAWSAP/AATIP then pushed DHS to fund a successor under a new name. In 2011, the DHS Under Secretary for Science and Technology established KONA BLUE as a Prospective Special Access Program, a status given to proposals still being evaluated for the tighter controls of a full special access program. Its stated purpose, per AARO’s review, was to protect the retrieval and exploitation of “non-human biologics.” What moved from the old DIA program to the new DHS one was personnel and advocacy. The file does not show DIA handing DHS any material, data, or holdings.

The Disapproval

Roughly six months after KONA BLUE was established, the DHS Deputy Secretary disapproved its special access program status and ordered immediate termination, which a secondary source citing the declassified document dates to February 10, 2012. The stated reason was insufficient justification, specifically gaps in the personnel and budget detail behind the proposal. Nothing in that disapproval, as the record describes it, weighs the “non-human biologics” claim on its merits, only the program’s administrative readiness. The file gives no exact date for the 2011 approval itself, only the year; the roughly six-month gap to termination is what the record supports.

AARO’s Finding

AARO surfaced KONA BLUE while conducting its broader historical review of government programs connected to unidentified anomalous phenomena. Its conclusion was that KONA BLUE never got past the proposal stage. It was never formally approved for funding, never staffed, and never received data or physical material of any kind. Separately, AARO’s wider review found that no extraterrestrial craft or bodies were ever collected under any program in its historical scope. Whatever records exist from AAWSAP/AATIP’s own activity remain archived with DIA. They are not held by DHS and are not administratively tied to KONA BLUE.

Why the Ordinary Explanation Holds

Read plainly, KONA BLUE looks like a proposal that failed to clear an internal bar, not a program shut down to bury something. No manifest, chain-of-custody record, or budget line anywhere in the file documents material moving to DHS, even though AARO’s review found that some DHS personnel expected delivery once the special access program was formally in place. An expectation on someone’s part is not evidence that anything actually changed hands. A proposal lasting about six months with no staff and no funding is a familiar shape in federal paperwork. Most prospective special access programs that fail do so for exactly these reasons: thin personnel detail, an unfinished budget case, and a senior official unwilling to sign off on either.

What the Record Doesn’t Say

Several gaps are worth naming directly. The release gives no exact date for the 2011 approval, only the year it was established. The interviewees who told AARO that KONA BLUE existed to protect “non-human biologics” are not named in the public file, and their accounts are not corroborated anywhere else in it. The 57-page proposal itself carries no visible authorship in what has been made public, no name and no office signature line. And The Black Vault’s additional FOIA requests, pending since January 2024, remain open, which means the record now public may not be the complete record.

The Phrase and Its Source

The sentence that gives KONA BLUE its charge, that it existed to protect the retrieval and exploitation of “non-human biologics,” does not come from the 2011 proposal’s own stated language as AARO describes it. It comes from unnamed interviewees who told AARO this during the historical review, more than a decade after the program had already failed. That is the only place in the file where the phrase is tied to a stated purpose with any specificity. No document, sample, or funding record in the release backs it independently. What is documented is a proposal, an approval, a disapproval about six months on, and an empty ledger where the biologics would have had to appear.